Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Masses 7 Centimeters or Larger
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVE To report our operative experience and oncologic outcomes for the laparoscopic management of large renal tumors. METHODS All laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomies performed at our institution were reviewed. Thirty patients with tumors >or=7cm and a pathologic diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma were included. RESULTS Mean operative time was 175.7+/-24.5 minutes, and mean estimated blood loss was 275.5+/-165.8 mL. No case required conversion to open radical nephrectomy. The mean hospital stay was 2.4+/-1.6 days. Four patients (13%) had minor complications. Of the 30 tumors, 18 were pathologic stage T2, 9 were stage T3a, 2 were stage T3b, and one was stage T4. At a mean follow-up of 30 months (range, 10 to 70), 22 patients (73%) were alive without evidence of recurrence, and 5 patients (17%) were alive with disease. One patient (3%) died of complications related to renal cell carcinoma, and 2 patients (7%) died from other causes. Overall survival was 90%, cancer-specific survival was 97%, and recurrence-free survival was 80%. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large tumors is a technically challenging operation. However, in experienced hands, it is a reasonable therapeutic option for the management of larger RCC neoplasms.
منابع مشابه
Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large (greater than 7 cm, T2) renal tumors.
PURPOSE Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy has emerged as a standard of care in appropriate candidates with clinical stage T1 renal tumors (7 cm or less). Herein we present our experience with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for clinical stage T2 tumors (greater than 7 cm). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy between September 1997 and July 2003 were retr...
متن کاملLaparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors 7cm and above. Perioperative outcomes
PURPOSE To assess and report the outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy )LPN) for T2 renal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective review of patients undergoing LPN for clinically localized renal masses ≥7cm between the years 2005-2016. Descriptive analyses were generated for demographics, lesion characteristics, perioperative variables (operative time, warm ischemia time (WIT), est...
متن کاملLaparoscopic total and partial nephrectomy.
Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy has established its role as a standard of care for the management of renal neoplasms. Long term follow-up has demonstrated laparoscopic radical nephrectomy has shorter patient hospitalization and effective cancer control, with no significant difference in survival compared with open radical nephrectomy. For renal masses less than 4cm, partial nephrectomy is indi...
متن کاملLaparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience.
PURPOSE The laparoscopic approach for renal cell carcinoma is slowly evolving. We report our experience with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and compare it to a contemporary cohort of patients with renal cell carcinoma who underwent open radical nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS From 1990 to 1999, 32 males and 28 females underwent 61 laparoscopic radical nephrectomies for suspicious renal c...
متن کاملLaparoscopic radical nephrectomy in extremely obese patients
Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy has been widely accepted as the preferred management of low stage renal masses. Endoscopic management is advantageous for its reduction in perioperative and postoperative complications. In the mid-1990s, morbid obesity was considered a relative contraindication to laparoscopic technique. The authors present two cases of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy due to re...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 13 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009